Skip to content
Sample data

See how CARS practice works, and the plan around it.

Click through the app below. Open Predict mode to practice a CARS passage: commit your reasoning before the choices unlock, then see the four-section plan, calendar, and cards built around it. Every screen is real. The data belongs to a fictional student named Alex (exam in 14 weeks, 20 hours a week). Nothing here is connected to a backend.

Alex is not a real person. None of this data is real. The app is.

premedulla.com/app

Alex's study plan

Exam in 14 weeks · 20 hrs/week · CARS + Psych/Soc

Sample data

Choose a track

Comprehensive walks through every content block in order, chapter by chapter, before adding heavy practice. Best when you have 10 or more weeks. Alex starts with CARS chapter 1 this week, does the concept quiz, then moves through Psych/Soc content before practice ramps up in weeks 7-14.

This week (Week 1 of 14)

CARS Chapter 1: Reading for structure

~45 min read + concept quiz

Diagnostic - CARS section

Done

Psych/Soc Chapter 1: Social processes

~40 min read + concept quiz

Daily flashcards (15 cards, 10 min)

Built from your weak areas

Predict mode - CARS

Commit your reasoning. Then the choices unlock.

Sample data

Sample passage (abridged)

The historian's task is not to render judgment but to reconstruct. Yet the act of selecting which events to narrate, which actors to foreground, and which silences to acknowledge already constitutes a form of interpretation. No account is neutral; every archive reflects the concerns of its keepers. This does not make historical writing arbitrary. It makes the historian's methods the object of scrutiny as much as the events themselves.

Critics of this position argue that acknowledging interpretive bias is an invitation to relativism - the view that all accounts are equally valid. But the critic mistakes transparency for abandonment of standards. A historian who discloses her assumptions is not claiming that any assumption will do. She is claiming that hidden assumptions are more dangerous than visible ones.

Question 1 of 5

The author's primary purpose in the second paragraph is to:

Step 1: Write your answer before looking at the choices.

What do you think the answer is and why? Be specific about what the paragraph does.

Choices unlock once you commit. You can still edit after - but commit first.

Step 2: Pick an answer

Explanation

The second paragraph opens by naming a critic - someone who argues that acknowledging bias leads to relativism. The author's move is to push back: she distinguishes transparency (disclosing assumptions) from relativism (accepting any assumption as valid). The paragraph's job is to rebut an objection, not to make a new argument or provide examples. B is the only choice that captures this "address the objection" function accurately.

Self-check

Compare your written reasoning above with this explanation. Did you identify that the paragraph was responding to an objection? Did you catch the transparency/relativism distinction? That is where most misses happen on this question type.

Paid tier: AI reasoning grading (coming)

When paid tiers launch, the AI reads your written reasoning and tells you exactly where it diverged from the passage. The free self-check above is the core method - the AI grading goes deeper on the specific move you made.

Study calendar

Week of June 16 - 22 - Week 1 of 14

Sample data

One-way push - your study blocks appear in Google Calendar. Changes you make in Google Calendar do not sync back here.

Mon
16
Tue
17
Wed
18
Thu
19
Fri
20
Sat
21
Sun
22
8am
CARS Ch.1
CARS Ch.1 Quiz
P/S Ch.1
Practice x2
9am
Flashcards
P/S Ch.1
Flashcards
10am
Flashcards
Flashcards
Flashcards
11am

Sample week only. Your real calendar builds from your actual plan and available hours.

Today's flashcards

15 cards queued from your plan. 4 remaining this session.

Sample data
Progress11 / 15 done

CARS - Argument structure

What does the author mean when they introduce an opponent's view only to dismiss it?

Tap "Show answer" when you are ready.

Answer

This is a strawman refutation (CARS taxonomy: Argument Trap). The author uses the opponent's position as a foil to strengthen their own. It is not a neutral description of the opposing view. On a passage-based question about the author's purpose, recognize this as a rhetorical move, not an endorsement of the opponent.

Card 12 of 15 - from your CARS weak-area deck

Textbook: CARS Chapter 1

Reading for structure - queued from your plan

Sample data

You do not have to read the whole chapter. Read at whatever depth helps you. The quiz at the end is what counts. Pass the quiz and the topic moves toward mastered. Miss it and it stays on your radar.

1.1 What structure means in a CARS passage

Every CARS passage has a job. The author is arguing for something, complicating something, or defending something against a critic. Your job as a reader is to track that argument - not to absorb every fact, but to understand what position the author holds and why.

Structure questions (author's purpose, main idea, function of a paragraph) are the most common question type on CARS. They test whether you can see the skeleton of the argument, not whether you remember the details. The detail questions - the ones asking you what the passage says about X - are answerable from the text if you can find the relevant paragraph fast.

Reading for structure means asking, at the end of each paragraph: what did this paragraph do? Did it introduce the author's thesis? Did it bring in a counterargument to rebut it? Did it provide an example? Did it qualify the main claim?

Analytics - Alex's overview

Week 1 of 14 - CARS + Psych/Soc

Sample data

CARS

In progress
Argument structure38%
Author purpose52%
Inference61%
Tone and attitude74%

Psych/Soc

Started
Social processes20%
Identity and behavior15%
Cognition0%
Research methods0%

Priority weak areas

CARS - Argument structure 38% - Priority
CARS - Author purpose 52% - Needs work
P/S - Social processes 20% - Priority

As you complete concept quizzes and practice, these numbers update. Solidified topics drop down the list automatically.

Note on real data: In the live app, weak-area analysis only shows once you have enough attempts to make the pattern meaningful. At very low attempt counts, the app says so directly rather than showing numbers that could mislead.

Ready to build your own plan?

Get started free

No card needed. Your plan is ready in minutes.